Samuel Bangura, Princess Thulile Duma, Ntombifuthi Alexia Mthembu
Background: Social entrepreneurship (SE) has emerged as an innovative mechanism
to tackle persistent societal challenges, such as poverty, unemployment, and
inequality, by prioritising social impact alongside sustainable business models.
This is particularly relevant in resource-constrained emerging economies like
South Africa, where high unemployment (approximately 33%) and weaknesses in the
entrepreneurial ecosystem (ranked 49th globally) hinder traditional economic
development (ED) pathways.
Objectives: This systematic review aims to examine the relationship between SE
and ED, exploring definitions of SE, its interconnections with ED, contextual
applications (with a focus on South Africa), associated challenges,
opportunities, enabling factors, and contributions to sustainable growth and the
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
Materials and Methods: using a systematic lierature review approached, the
review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and
Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework. Peer-reviewed articles were systematically
searched across databases including Scopus, EBSCO (encompassing ABI/INFORM,
Business Source Complete, Emerald Management, and GreenFILE), and Google
Scholar, using keywords such as "social entrepreneurship," "economic
development," "small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)," and "job creation."
Inclusion criteria focused on scholarly, peer-reviewed papers with robust
methodology; 180 documents were excluded due to lack of relevance, absence of
peer review, or methodological deficiencies, yielding a synthesised body of
literature for thematic analysis.
Results: SE significantly drives ED globally, generating an estimated $2
trillion in revenue and creating 200 million jobs, while fostering innovations
in healthcare, education, and poverty alleviation. In South Africa, SE addresses
unemployment and inequality through community-driven initiatives, despite
challenges like funding limitations, regulatory barriers, mission drift, and low
entrepreneurial awareness (11.9%). Opportunities include digital technologies,
microfinance, youth programs, and South-South collaborations, supported by
enablers such as adaptive management, stakeholder engagement, and social
capital. Theoretically, SE enhances frameworks like Amartya Sen’s capabilities
approach and institutional theory.
Conclusion: Social entrepreneurship serves as a vital catalyst for inclusive and
sustainable economic development, complementing governmental efforts in emerging
markets. While challenges persist, leveraging opportunities and enablers can
amplify its impact. Future research should prioritise empirical metrics, digital
integration, longitudinal studies, and comparative analyses to maximise SE’s
transformative potential.